<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Toronto Dating Scene &#187; Affiliate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toronto-dating.ca/dating/affiliate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toronto-dating.ca</link>
	<description>Online Dating News and Reviews for Toronto Dating</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 05:02:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dating Site Affiliate Stoops To New Low</title>
		<link>http://toronto-dating.ca/2011/02/13/dating-site-affiliate-stoops-to-new-low/</link>
		<comments>http://toronto-dating.ca/2011/02/13/dating-site-affiliate-stoops-to-new-low/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 22:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Toronto Dating</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Affiliate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dating Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile app]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toronto-dating.ca/?p=424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How&#8217;s this for an affiliate of an online dating site?: You create a shitty app for Android. All the app does is boot up a screen and then redirects you to a sign up page for x dating site. The sign up link is, of course, an affiliate link. That&#8217;s all the app does. Clever [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How&#8217;s this for an affiliate of an online dating site?<span id="more-424"></span>: You create a shitty app for <a href="https://market.android.com/">Android</a>. All the app does is boot up a screen and then redirects you to a sign up page for x dating site. The sign up link is, of course, an affiliate link. That&#8217;s all the app does. Clever or lame? I&#8217;m voting lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://toronto-dating.ca/2011/02/13/dating-site-affiliate-stoops-to-new-low/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Dating Ads Get Reeled In</title>
		<link>http://toronto-dating.ca/2010/10/11/facebook-dating-ads-get-reeled-in/</link>
		<comments>http://toronto-dating.ca/2010/10/11/facebook-dating-ads-get-reeled-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Toronto Dating</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niche Dating Sites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toronto-dating.ca/?p=347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook dating ads are notoriously of poor quality and granted something likely had to be done to rein them in. You can blame affiliates for most of it, I&#8217;d say. They don&#8217;t care about damaging the brand of the service they&#8217;re plugging &#8212; they just want their quick buck for referring traffic to dating sites. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://toronto-dating.ca/dating/facebook/">Facebook</a> dating ads are notoriously of poor quality and granted something likely had to be done to rein them in. You can blame <a href="http://toronto-dating.ca/dating/affiliate/">affiliates</a> for most of it, I&#8217;d say. <span id="more-347"></span>They don&#8217;t care about damaging the brand of the service they&#8217;re plugging &#8212; they just want their quick buck for referring traffic to dating sites. They have no long term interest in it, so they create ads that just get the clicks (and hopefully the sign ups) so they can get paid. Also, since Facebook&#8217;s ad system is different than most (you create your own text copy and upload an image) it&#8217;s not as easy for dating affiliate managers to keep control &#8212; as the affiliate is creating everything on Facebook&#8217;s ad system &#8212; i.e. it&#8217;s not just a copy/paste of code that then produces the banner and appropriate landing URLs.</p>
<p>So, what has Facebook done in part of the clamp down? You can&#8217;t make it known in the landing page AND ad copy that you know anything identifiable about the group you&#8217;re targeting. For example, if you can&#8217;t mention &#8216;Toronto&#8217; in the ad if you&#8217;re only targeting those in Toronto&#8230; Odd, yes. Ditto for certain ages, and such. Even if your site only caters to a certain niche group, you still can&#8217;t mention that in your ad or landing page &#8211; if it matches the targeting parameters you chose on the Facebook ad system.</p>
<p>Overkill? Definitely. Will this shoo away niche-advertisers? Likely. I think they need to revisit this policy. Yes, something had to be done, but they went too far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://toronto-dating.ca/2010/10/11/facebook-dating-ads-get-reeled-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Dating Ads Not Liked</title>
		<link>http://toronto-dating.ca/2010/06/15/facebook-dating-ads-not-liked/</link>
		<comments>http://toronto-dating.ca/2010/06/15/facebook-dating-ads-not-liked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Toronto Dating</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dating Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niche Dating Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dating sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook dating ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toronto-dating.ca/?p=260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online dating site ads on Facebook are the most disliked among Facebook users.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a <a href="http://www.insidefacebook.com/2010/06/15/facebook-users-survey-results-ads/">survey conducted</a> about Facebook users and their enjoyment (or lack there of) of ads shown on Facebook, online <a href="http://toronto-dating.ca/dating/dating/">dating</a> ads ranked the least liked.<span id="more-260"></span></p>
<p>For &#8216;What advertised product do you like least?&#8217;, Dating Sites were in the lead with 46%, far outpacing Education Programs Or Job Sites as the second least liked.</p>
<p>My take: Affiliates have gone crazy with Facebook. Facebook ads let you supply an image with your ad, along with text. This setup is not typical for advertisers, so dating site affiliate programs do not have drop-in code for affiliates to use for Facebook (the format doesn&#8217;t allow for this). Thus, you have affiliates using their own creative and their own text. This is where things get out of hand. You&#8217;ll have smutty photos plugging all types of dating sites &#8211; including <a href="http://toronto-dating.ca/dating/niche-dating-sites/">niches</a> for which it makes no sense. Affiliates don&#8217;t care, they just want to make money. The smuttier the image, the higher the click-through rate (likely). Thing is, they are destroying online dating brands in the mean time. How many online dating brands disallow affiliates to use <a href="http://toronto-dating.ca/dating/facebook/">Facebook</a>? There should be more, because what is going on is out of control and destroying brands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://toronto-dating.ca/2010/06/15/facebook-dating-ads-not-liked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dating Affiliates Spamming Friendster Pages</title>
		<link>http://toronto-dating.ca/2010/02/09/dating-affiliates-spamming-friendster-pages/</link>
		<comments>http://toronto-dating.ca/2010/02/09/dating-affiliates-spamming-friendster-pages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Toronto Dating</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Affiliate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toronto-dating.ca/?p=234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve seen this more than once when do search analysis for the online dating industry: Dating site affiliates creating Friendster accounts under names that are search terms and filling the profile with links and image ads for dating sites (mostly smut-type &#8216;dating&#8217; sites). They pages rank decently well as they are on the Friendster.com domain. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen this more than once when do search analysis for the online dating industry: Dating site affiliates creating Friendster accounts under names that are search terms and filling the profile with links and image ads for dating sites (mostly smut-type &#8216;dating&#8217; sites).<span id="more-234"></span> They pages rank decently well as they are on the Friendster.com domain. The title tag and URLs are SEO optimized as they take the profile name you provide. Thus, using an SEO-friendly Friendster account name ranks half decently well for some dating search terms. Just the latest in the dating affiliate spam battle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://toronto-dating.ca/2010/02/09/dating-affiliates-spamming-friendster-pages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mate1.com Ads Showing for Smut Terms on Google AdWords</title>
		<link>http://toronto-dating.ca/2010/01/12/mate1-com-ads-showing-for-smut-terms-on-google-adwords/</link>
		<comments>http://toronto-dating.ca/2010/01/12/mate1-com-ads-showing-for-smut-terms-on-google-adwords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Toronto Dating</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mate1.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mate1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toronto-dating.ca/?p=223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#8217;m reading about how &#8216;The Beaver&#8217;, Canada&#8217;s History Magazine changed it&#8217;s name away from &#8216;The Beaver&#8217; (to allow their email get through adult spam filters) and thus I do a quick search for &#8216;beaver&#8217; in Google to see what comes up immediately. There&#8217;s one paid search ad showing for me (in Canada): Mate1.com&#8217;s AdWords [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;m <a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/related/links/story.html?id=2432197">reading</a> about how &#8216;The Beaver&#8217;, Canada&#8217;s History Magazine changed it&#8217;s name away from &#8216;The Beaver&#8217; (to allow their email get through adult spam filters) and thus I do a quick search for &#8216;beaver&#8217; in Google to see what comes up immediately. <span id="more-223"></span>There&#8217;s one paid search ad showing for me (in Canada): Mate1.com&#8217;s AdWords ad stating they have &#8216;Dirty Girls in your Area&#8217;. As soon as I began writing this post I was thinking maybe it&#8217;s the work of an affilate. Click on the link and the URL includes AFFID=30655-G-38&#038;sid=7a3844e94cdb9493 so this could be the work of an affiliate, and not Mate1.com itself. Of course, knowing the typical content of a Mate1.com ad, I&#8217;m sure they would be all over this keyword themselves, if they had thought of it.</p>
<p><img src="http://toronto-dating.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/beaver-mate1.gif" alt="Mate1.com&#039;s ad for &#039;beaver&#039;" title="Mate1.com&#039;s ad for &#039;beaver&#039;" width="480" height="263" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-224" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://toronto-dating.ca/2010/01/12/mate1-com-ads-showing-for-smut-terms-on-google-adwords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

